Apologies - I'm living and breathing this right now and have harassed several members in the pub already!
I have a year long fight with my neighbours, Network Rail who after several complaints made by myself regarding damage caused by maintenance work decided to fence across my lawn including removing my 20 yr old shed which BACKED on to an ancient boundary hedge. Basically 2-3 foot extra into my garden rather than behind the hedgerow.
Regardless of my explanation that I owned the garden and had bought EXACTLY as is 13 years earlier they sent their men to do the work anyway so I was forced to take out an injunction. I'm told probably the 1st one from a private individual against them!
After a year of them dragging their heels (even though I had a written agreement made 4 days after the injunction was served,) insisting on stays of action every couple of months or so, they have now decided to defend actions regardless of most of the evidence pointing towards the land being still registered to Beazer homes(landlocked bit between NR and my deeds).
This was just after they discovered my free legal advisor had had a massive stroke. They know I can't afford the up front payment of 10-20 grand for legal representation so I have to do it myself.
Thats a very short description, our 3 primary political candidates and our MP have more in depth versions. Letters from our MP to Network Rail have, I'm told, been ignored! Basically it involves bullying tactics by a tax payer funded organisation, some of the behaviour I've had to put up with is pretty shocking, including terrifying my kids!!
So.. a tax payer funded organisation which believes it is not accountable to anyone.
and also if looked at in depth an organisation which can in my opinion target members of the public just because they very rightly complained( I was told verbally that it looked like i might have been labeled a troublemaker).
2 a legal system that is now financially totally out of reach of most people meaning that companies such as NR KNOW they can do what they want, which is what they intended to do to me(when I was chasing a man around my childrens climbing frame and telling him the injunction was going in , he said but you haven't done it yet) . Just taking out the initial injunction cost me just short of £500 so thank goodness I still a have a credit card!
Fortunately my costs are relatively low as a result of free legal help up to November, most aren't as lucky as me!
As said before I've asked all candidates to support me, even if its just to write to the Directors of the company(which I've now done twice), or get a bit of media attention for my issue. However 1 says there is nothing they can do, 1 acknowledged initial email, 1 didn't bother responding. I have invited all 3 round to see for themselves, none have replied to that.
I personally think actions speak louder than words. Anyone can spout all the rhetoric they want but if they don't actually get off their a*** to do something * ANYTHING* to support a potential constituent in a situation which is clearly, when viewed as a whole, totally unreasonable, unfair and clear cut, then what are they really prepared to do for anyone? As said in my previous post I am probably going to vote tactically this time, and in that case my vote will have to go with the most proactive candidate.