Where have the 7608 gone????

[sooty2]

It's not easy to make sense of, is it.    However, my guess is that the addresses in capitals, which have a date in the column on the left headed 'Consultation Letter Sent', are those near the site who were automatically sent a neighbour consultation letter.  The other addresses are mostly in lower case, and without a date beside them, and those are the responses from the rest of us.  I scrolled down and eventually found mine, and I had responded electronically on the council website.

Glad to see I'm on with my neighbor two votes for Asda

Look at some of the addresses one from leyland and Hyde  ,as I said a the time. A lot won't be from round hear .fidling the list

Wow Amazon, How do you know how they voted? Do tell.

[wheels]

In advance of the forthcoming Area Committee meeting on 6 February, I see that MIA have posted the following claim on the 'Latest News' thread:  'This is your opportunity to show the Councillors who remain neutral on the issue of a Hibbert Lane supermarket, that the majority of people in Marple oppose that development.'

The population of Marple is around 23,500.  392 people have objected to the planning application.  At the risk of stating the obvious, 392 is not a majority of 23,500.   

Correct Dave. MiA will also whip people up to think that the meeting has some significance when it fact all that will happen is that it will refer the application to the Planning Committee. The only reason its being held as a special meeting is so that the business of the normal meeting is not disrupted

[Dave]

In advance of the forthcoming Area Committee meeting on 6 February, I see that MIA have posted the following claim on the 'Latest News' thread:  'This is your opportunity to show the Councillors who remain neutral on the issue of a Hibbert Lane supermarket, that the majority of people in Marple oppose that development.'

The population of Marple is around 23,500.  392 people have objected to the planning application.  At the risk of stating the obvious, 392 is not a majority of 23,500.   

[nbt]

I too responded by email and have no date in the "letter sent" column. My wife also responded, yet our address only appears once

[jethroh65]

It's not easy to make sense of, is it.     However, my guess is that the addresses in capitals, which have a date in the column on the left headed 'Consultation Letter Sent', are those near the site who were automatically sent a neighbour consultation letter.  The other addresses are mostly in lower case, and without a date beside them, and those are the responses from the rest of us.  I scrolled down and eventually found mine, and I had responded electronically on the council website.

Glad to see I'm on with my neighbor two votes for Asda .

So given that everyone had the opportunity to respond, those for 58 those against 392. The proposal is duly rejected 

[amazon]

It's not easy to make sense of, is it.    However, my guess is that the addresses in capitals, which have a date in the column on the left headed 'Consultation Letter Sent', are those near the site who were automatically sent a neighbour consultation letter.  The other addresses are mostly in lower case, and without a date beside them, and those are the responses from the rest of us.  I scrolled down and eventually found mine, and I had responded electronically on the council website.

Glad to see I'm on with my neighbor two votes for Asda

Look at some of the addresses one from leyland and Hyde  ,as I said a the time. A lot won't be from round hear .fidling the list

[amazon]

It's not easy to make sense of, is it.     However, my guess is that the addresses in capitals, which have a date in the column on the left headed 'Consultation Letter Sent', are those near the site who were automatically sent a neighbour consultation letter.  The other addresses are mostly in lower case, and without a date beside them, and those are the responses from the rest of us.  I scrolled down and eventually found mine, and I had responded electronically on the council website.

Glad to see I'm on with my neighbor two votes for Asda .

[Dave]

It's not easy to make sense of, is it.     However, my guess is that the addresses in capitals, which have a date in the column on the left headed 'Consultation Letter Sent', are those near the site who were automatically sent a neighbour consultation letter.  The other addresses are mostly in lower case, and without a date beside them, and those are the responses from the rest of us.  I scrolled down and eventually found mine, and I had responded electronically on the council website.

[Cyberman]

I don't know if the "list of consultees" in the above link is everyone who has responded, but if so my address isn't there and I responded by e-mail before the deadline. Perhaps the numbers don't include e-mail responses, or perhaps mine (and others) were lost?

[Bluezorro]

I would have thought that having a few thousand objections would add more weight in objection.

Shame more of the 8000 did'nt make the effort.

[wheels]

http://planning.stockport.gov.uk/PlanningData/AcolNetCGI.gov?ACTION=UNWRAP&RIPNAME=Root.PgeNeighbours&TheSystemkey=116256

8000 on petition but only 392 objected to planning???

WOW that is quite a collapse from all those in the park, all those stalls in the street, all the verbage.

[Bluezorro]

http://planning.stockport.gov.uk/PlanningData/AcolNetCGI.gov?ACTION=UNWRAP&RIPNAME=Root.PgeNeighbours&TheSystemkey=116256

8000 on petition but only 392 objected to planning???