It is indeed a foregone conclusion. But a closer reading of the supporting papers for the Chadwick Street scheme underlines a number of shortcomings and 'unknowns' in this proposal.
1. The council's own consultants estimate a delay of up to five years before the site can be cleared, the sorting office relocated, and the scheme be 'shovel ready'.
2. There is no supermarket signed up, and no evidence of serious interest by any supermarket chain.
3. Chadwick Street is a multi-level scheme on steeply sloping site - the fall is 5m east to west, and 7m south to north. The construction will therefore be costly, and in addition, there are a number of other expensive features, including a rotating turntable for delivery vehicles.
So the possibility emerges of a worst-case scenario:
1. Hibbert lane is rejected, on the grounds that the existence of the Chadwick Street scheme causes it to fail the 'sequential test' for edge-of-centre schemes.
2. By 2018, Kirkland have failed to find a supermarket chain which is interested, because the high costs of construction have driven up the rents to a level which is commercially unviable.
3. Nothing happens at Chadwick Street or at Hibbert lane, and our kids don't get their shiny new college.
Even if Kirkland succeed in finding a tenant, the fact that we don't know who it might be is deeply unsatisfactory. The joint applicants at Hibbert lane are Asda and Camsfc - what you see is what you get. But down the road at Chadwick Street, we only have these shadowy developers. Will it be an Aldi? Or a Waitrose? Who knows - but if it's either of those, then you can be sure that most of us will just carry on driving to Hazel Grove, Bredbury and Whaley Bridge to do our shopping.