My children went to MHS and then on to college. One went to CAMSFC and one is at Aquinas. As far as the teaching quality goes, I can't really see much difference. However, my son chose Aquinas because CAMSFC didn't have the courses he needed, specifically computing. With the importance of computing to modern life I find this quite surprising. Both colleges have a specific track to deal with incoming students who have already done AS maths from schools such as MHS.
When visiting the colleges, Aquinas does feel a world apart in it's facilities. It certainly feels far more like a modern university than CAMSFC which has its aging and sub-standard infrastructure. It feels like an old secondary school which is exactly what it is. Aquinas, with its modern building, is far more attractive. Let's face it, shiny sells. I know this is what CAMSFC's ASDA plan was supposed to correct. However, that's history. I suspect that if pupils look at their local sixth form options and see two aging secondary school buildings and one open, bright, shiny campus with excellent facilities, Aquinas could prove more attractive than CAMSFC and MHS.