Big lump of land for sale in Marple Bridge

[amazon]

Henrietta was simply asking you to explain your comment that it's "nightmare land". It seems quite a reasonable request and that's a very odd response to it.

Quite unsuitable for building on there  is a large culvert runs right through the area it has a large gradiant on both sides hence my comment nightmare land .
     

[admin]

Have you seen it .if so tell me about it .then i will know if you have seen it

Henrietta was simply asking you to explain your comment that it's "nightmare land". It seems quite a reasonable request and that's a very odd response to it.

[amazon]

Oh, why?

Have you seen it .if so tell me about it .then i will know if you have seen it

[willow]

It may be worth speaking to the Rollins Wood group who have recently done similar.

[My login is Henrietta]

ITS NIGHTMARE LAND.

Oh, why?

[amazon]

I could see someone getting planning to put one big house on the land with large grounds etc, or it must being brought by someone that owns a house overlooking it, as to do extend their grounds.

ITS NIGHTMARE LAND.

[ringi]

I could see someone getting planning to put one big house on the land with large grounds etc, or it must being brought by someone that owns a house overlooking it, as to do extend their grounds.

[My login is Henrietta]

Anyone with an interest in preserving this woodland should get in touch with the Woodland Trust

              http://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk

They may be able to help or offer advise with this.

No use saying "What a shame" when the paperwork is signed by a developer who is prepared to "sit" on it until he's ready to apply for planning permission.

[admin]

It'll be bought but probably by a cash rich individual fed up with 0.25% interest seeing this as a long term "pension".

Will that be you then @Phil ?

[Rudolph Hucker]

For the agent to acknowledge “Possibility of Developing Part of the Land in the Future” I would say this is a done deal with the planning offices. Just a few hoops to jump through and a couple of visits to speaker’s panel. The asking prices of £100K is a bit unrealistic more like £300K. Take Mellor Brook for example of what a developer can do with a couple of acres. This is the beginning of the in fill to Ley Lane, such a shame.

Are you the vendor Leejo? I rather suspect you are

If it was a done deal, or worth £300K, why do you think it is being sold for £100K with a covenant for 20 years? Nope, guaranteed that it won't get planning permission in at least 5 years, probably closer to 10, and then will we need it given HS2 will have been scrapped by then and the PP for 4000 homes on High Lane then being surplus to requirements?

It'll be bought but probably by a cash rich individual fed up with 0.25% interest seeing this as a long term "pension".

RH.

[Leejo]

For the agent to acknowledge “Possibility of Developing Part of the Land in the Future” I would say this is a done deal with the planning offices. Just a few hoops to jump through and a couple of visits to speaker’s panel. The asking prices of £100K is a bit unrealistic more like £300K. Take Mellor Brook for example of what a developer can do with a couple of acres. This is the beginning of the in fill to Ley Lane, such a shame.

[wheels]

It's certainly an attractive price and if a few hardworking individuals can raise 100 for the skate  park could a similar sum be raised to secure this plot of land for public use or at least none development use.

[Dave]

I doubt whether the slope is any steeper than that on the nearby 'painters estate'.

[amazon]

It looks highly speculative, but at that low price there may just be a few takers who fancy  a flutter, given the currently controversial Greater Manchester Spatial Framework, which includes plans to release areas of green belt for development. But not this one - yet!

Have you seen the land more slope on it than chadwick street car park .and a large stream .

[Dave]

It looks highly speculative, but at that low price there may just be a few takers who fancy  a flutter, given the currently controversial Greater Manchester Spatial Framework, which includes plans to release areas of green belt for development. But not this one - yet!